So, I'm last to know
Oct. 19th, 2007 10:44 pmBut Dumbledore was gay.
Well, duh.
The purple suit? The whole thing with Grindelwald? Seriously, the purple suit again? (okay, so the suit's a stereotype. But still.)
Okay, so I didn't really think it, but I am laughing my ass off over here. And given how rarely I swear, you must know that that means I'm laughing pretty damn hard.
Yeah, I would have preferred Remus/Sirius canon. But Dumbledore is just somehow funnier. Especially given his brother and the goats thing.
And now, everyone can stop the "oh, she only wrote Lupin/Tonks to degay the characters!" bit. I mean, yeah. I hated Lupin/Tonks in book 6 (it got redeemed a bit in book 7 because it was so messed up). But I always thought she wrote it because she wanted to- saying that she did it to degay him/her/them is a really nasty accusation, really.
::giggle:: Dumbledore. Sorry, but that's just really, really funny.
Well, duh.
The purple suit? The whole thing with Grindelwald? Seriously, the purple suit again? (okay, so the suit's a stereotype. But still.)
Okay, so I didn't really think it, but I am laughing my ass off over here. And given how rarely I swear, you must know that that means I'm laughing pretty damn hard.
Yeah, I would have preferred Remus/Sirius canon. But Dumbledore is just somehow funnier. Especially given his brother and the goats thing.
And now, everyone can stop the "oh, she only wrote Lupin/Tonks to degay the characters!" bit. I mean, yeah. I hated Lupin/Tonks in book 6 (it got redeemed a bit in book 7 because it was so messed up). But I always thought she wrote it because she wanted to- saying that she did it to degay him/her/them is a really nasty accusation, really.
::giggle:: Dumbledore. Sorry, but that's just really, really funny.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 02:54 am (UTC)Of course I would have preferred Remus/Sirius canon, too, but as long as she remains neutral on the subject I can have my personal fanon, thank you very much, and I am happy with that. :)
Man, all of the Dumbledore/Grindelwald shippers have got to be dancing in the streets.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:15 am (UTC)This is what happens when I'm not online all day.
Love it. :)) :))
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 04:37 am (UTC)Before, I thought he was an arrogant, self-righteous, manipulative son of a bitch.
Now, he's an arrogant, self-righteous, manipulative son of a bitch who happens to be gay. IF I decide to pay attention to her extracanonical statements, which I usually don't. I tend to go with the notion that if something is important enough to be canon, it should be in the books already.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 04:43 am (UTC)I do wonder, though, if there was some realistic way that she could have put Dumbledore's being gay into canon, given that the series was (mostly) told from Harry's POV, considering appropriateness and relevance. But then again, does it matter now, either?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 12:33 pm (UTC)Plus, as you say, he's an arrogant, self-righteous, manipulative SOB who happens to be gay, not someone who is all that stuff because he's gay. I'm not the world's biggest DD fan, but I don't quite consider him a huge villain, either. I think he's made some bad mistakes, and I think he's got a very shady past, but I think there's a reason he's so big on second chances, and it's because he knows he needed one, and he took it well. But that certainly doesn't make him perfect.
Truthfully, I couldn't get invested enough in him in the first five books to care too much by book 6 :)
And I'm still not writing DD fanfic! (I find him very difficult to write in general regardless.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-20 03:24 pm (UTC)